We try to provide the scientific information so that the people who are in a position of decision-making can make the best decisions possible.I was actually looking at so when it occurred to me that this that is the same subordinator as the that that introduces declarative content clauses. In other words, it's exactly the same as
I know that the people who are in a position of decision-making can make the best decisions possible.Notice in particular that in both cases that is omissible.
If my analysis is correct, it makes nonsense of any claims that so that should be used instead of so in clauses of cause, or in causes of result or in both or neither, all of which claims seem to be out there.
There is a difference. In the second case, the that serves as an aid to reader comprehension. Compare:
I know the people...
I know that the people...
Does the speaker mean she is familiar with the people, or that she knows a particular fact about them? Of course, the sentence can be parsed and understood without the that, but it's easier for the reader if the that is present.
On the other hand, I can't think of an example where so that would be preferable to plain so.
> If my analysis is correct, it makes nonsense of any claims that […]
I disagree. Call me a pinko descriptivist, but I think about the only thing that can make nonsense of such claims is information about actual usage.
For example, the you in "Don't you talk to him like that!" is the same you as the you in "Are you coming?"; but only the former you is optional. Language isn't always logical, and even when it is, sometimes the logic is more complex than is immediately apparent.
(Even in the specific case of the that that introduces declarative content clauses, some instances are more clearly optional than others. In your examples, it's completely omissible, but I think sentences like "It was kept top secret they were coming" or "The knowledge they were coming was not widely disseminated" are much iffier.)
Well, Ran, I think the data speaks for itself: After so, that is often included and it's often omitted. I didn't mean to suggest that that is omissible in all declarative content clause situations. It's certainly obligatory when such a clause functions as a subject.
> Well, Ran, I think the data speaks for itself: After so, that is often included and it's often omitted.
Oh, yes, certainly. I didn't mean to suggest that the claims aren't nonsense: they are. I meant only that your analysis is not what makes nonsense of them.
Brett I think 'so that' acts as a single semantic unit supplanting because in much the same way that 'for what' can replace why or 'in which manner' or 'at which time' can replace how or when.
Yes, I think many people think that way. What evidence is there to support that view?
It’s time for The Top 100 Language Blogs 2010 competition and the good news is your blog has been nominated. Congratulations!
After previous years’ success the bab.la language portal and Lexiophiles language blog are hosting our worldwide language blog competition once again.
We are looking for the top 100 language blogs in four categories: Language Learning, Language Teaching, Language Technology and Language Professionals.
You have been nominated to the following category: Language Professionals.
The nomination period goes from April 27th to May 11th. Each blog will have a one-sentence-description for the voting. If you would like a special description to go along with your blog, just send me an email (priscila [at] bab.la). The voting period goes from May 12th to May 24th. The winners will be announced on May 28th. Feel free to spread the word among bloggers writing about languages.
For more information on The Top 100 Language Blogs 2010 visit:
On behalf of the bab.la and Lexiophiles team
Post a Comment